Back

Nachrichten.fr · June 9, 2026

Nadav Lapid withdraws from FID Marseille following calls for boycott

Marseille – 09.06.2026: Israeli director Nadav Lapid has canceled his participation in the International Documentary Festival (FID) Marseille, scheduled to take place from July 7 to 12, 2026. This decision follows calls for a boycott initiated by several film professionals, who protested against his presence and withdrew their participation from the festival.

Lapid, who has been living in France since 2021, is known for his critical view of the Israeli government. He was supposed to serve on the festival jury and present his latest film “The Policeman” as well as the documentary “Yes” (2025). The latter offers a nuanced view of Israeli society after the events of October 7, 2023, and the subsequent conflict in Gaza.

The controversy began when festival participants supporting the cultural boycott against Israel withdrew their films from the competition. They justified their protest by refusing to support institutions linked to the Israeli state. Lapid himself strongly criticized these boycott calls, calling them “cruel” and “perverse.”

Tsveta Dobreva, director of FID Marseille, explained that these boycott actions came from a group within the festival. Lapid had initially been invited to be part of the jury, but a movement later emerged to exclude him. Subsequently, the scheduled screening of his film and a reading of his book were also subject to boycott. In this context, Lapid chose to withdraw so as not to further complicate the festival’s situation.

FID Marseille regretted this incident and emphasized in a statement that it is unacceptable to hold individual artists responsible for the political decisions of their national government. The festival reaffirmed its commitment to diversity of opinions and insisted on the importance of “giving voice to and supporting individual voices like that of Nadav Lapid.”

These events highlight the delicate positions of artists and cultural institutions when they become targets of international political conflicts. They show how closely artistic freedom and political stances are linked, as well as how cultural events are increasingly integrated into political debates.

This case also illustrates how boycott strategies targeting certain countries or their representatives in the cultural field can generate tensions that go far beyond the simple framework of cinema. Many voices warn against the instrumentalization of cultural platforms for political conflicts, as this complicates independent artistic work and harms dialogue between different perspectives. Despite Lapid’s withdrawal, the theme of cultural freedom and political responsibility remains at the heart of international debates on culture.

Sources

  • Le Monde
  • AFP
  • Le Film Français