Back

Nachrichten.fr · May 26, 2026

Gabriel Attal and the difficult search for 'post-Macronism'

(Mit Hilfe von KI erstellte Illustration).

Gabriel Attal has done what had been expected in Paris for months: the former prime minister is officially running for the presidency in 2027. His statement in the southern French town of Mur-de-Barrez was more than just a simple announcement of his candidacy. With statements like “J’aime passionnément la France,” Attal presented himself as a patriotic optimist, a dynamic representative of a new generation – and at the same time as the political heir to the Macron years.

However, this is precisely his biggest problem.

Because Attal has to find an almost contradictory balance: he needs Emmanuel Macron’s political capital without succumbing to its wear and tear. After nearly a decade of Macronism, the French center is still electable but clearly tired. The great reform promises of 2017 – economic modernization, political renewal, overcoming the old left-right scheme – have lost strength. The pension reform, social tensions, and the sense of permanent crisis management have visibly burdened the camp of the political center.

Attal is now trying to present himself as a “new face,” although he himself is one of the most well-known figures of the Macron system. At 37 years old, he embodies youth, media savvy, and rhetorical precision. As Minister of Education and later as Prime Minister, he demonstrated political discipline and communicative talent. But it is precisely this proximity to power that makes his candidacy complicated. Many voters associate him less with renewal and more with continuity.

Added to this is competition within his own camp. Above all, Édouard Philippe remains the more credible option for many moderate voters. The former prime minister has a statesmanlike profile, higher approval ratings, and a reputation for greater political independence from Macron. While Attal strongly focuses on dynamism and generational change, Philippe embodies stability and experience. The struggle for the political center will therefore early on become a power duel between two different interpretations of the Macron legacy.

At the same time, pressure from the right is growing. Rassemblement National still benefits from the fragmentation of the center and the weakness of traditional parties. Whether Marine Le Pen or Jordan Bardella runs as a candidate: the national right-wing remains in many scenarios the strongest force in the first round. For Attal, this means that mere popularity will not be enough. He needs a political narrative that goes beyond style and personality.

So far, symbolism dominates. Patriotic rhetoric, closeness to the citizens, and youthful energy can generate attention, but they do not replace a strategic project for France’s economic and social problems. The crucial question, therefore, is whether Attal can formulate a credible “after”: a France after Macron that nonetheless does not break with Macronism.

His candidacy will depend on this. If he succeeds in this balancing act, he could become the candidate of a liberal renewal. If he fails, he risks the role of a talented but ultimately too closely connected official with an exhausted political model.

By Andreas Brucker